Skip to main content
Now building my TET.Life Store.

America, it's time to point the guns at yourself (wait... what?)

Note: I originally wrote this article earlier in the year and then didn't publish it as I felt the outrage over the mass shooting that inspired it had subsided and the article no longer was topical. However, looking at this list of mass shootings during 2015 in the USA  I can't actually recall which one inspired this article (it may have been the Charleston Church Shooting in June 2015).  However, looking at the list I noticed you only need wait about a week or so for the next mass shooting in the USA.

Unless of course you follow the FBI's guidelines for classifying mass shootings, in which case data provided by Mother Jones: A Guide to Mass Shooting in America is far more pleasing to the eye with only four mass shootings in 2015.



Either way, people rampaging with guns is always topical in America. It happens so often they only seem to report the ones with unusually high casualties or particularly unusual locations. Anyhow... on to my article...

The coup has flown when it comes to gun control laws in the USA. Gun owners, who support tighter gun controls, probably would turn on a dime if the new criteria suggested in any way shape or form that they're no longer suitable candidates for gun ownership and should hand in their guns.

Gun owners who don't support tighter controls, and believe current laws are just fine, or in some cases lobby for even more gun ownership, usually have an answer for every argument supporting tighter gun control laws. Whether their answer is right or wrong is moot. Their political power appears to be just too strong against any kind of further restriction on gun ownership.

Regardless, no matter how much you try to legislate for tighter controls on legally owned guns, there's always someone who points out that a considerable amount of gun crime occurs using stolen guns. Usually this will be pointed out by a pro gun activist who rarely mentions that a large percentage of those guns are stolen from legal gun owners during home burglaries. (Secure your guns people).

The argument is that Americans need their guns for self defense (once you get beyond the people who own guns for legitimate reasons such as their job requires it or they're an active participant in a sports shooting association for example). The idea that somehow carrying, or at least owning, a gun makes you feel safer and somehow lessens the chance of being attacked. The more people who own guns the more likely it is a criminal will encounter someone with a gun - hence it's not worth the risk trying in the first place. Yet they do. Here are some examples that demonstrate gun ownership can reduce deaths provided citizen public is pro-active.

Personally, I don't feel any safer knowing people have guns and I wouldn't feel more safer owning one myself. People who walk into a school randomly shooting are expecting to die, or at least haven't thought much about that as an outcome. Time and again people don't see this type of crime coming. Even if you carry a gun how pro-active do you think you'd be against someone that's shooting anyone in their line of sight?

A sniper shooting randomly is going to be very hard to take down by Joe or Jane Public. It's fortunate that sniper shootings are less of an occurrence because that would be my choice of random killing spree (wait... what? no, think about it... if you just want to see the world burn why make yourself an easy target? Stick around to enjoy the outrage and pain you're causing.).

In my opinion, the only self defense you need to know is how to keep a cool head along with strategies to disarm someone with a gun if you're in immediate danger and, strategies to get you and others to safety if the threat isn't immediate. Leave any actual shooting to law enforcement - it's much less complicated if they deal with whether opening fire was justified.

Gun ownership in America seems less about protecting people from terrorism than it is about protecting yourselves from each other. Terrorists tend to prefer bomb attacks over mass shootings anyway. No amount of gun ownership can protect you from a well concealed bomb. Note, if you're a terrorist using guns openly in the USA, you're doing it wrong.

Americans are more likely to become victims of domestic crime than they are a terrorist attack. That's what people feel they need to defend themselves against. Americans are already pointing guns at each other and, if you haven't and you own a gun for self defense, you're at least thinking you may have to some day.

Perhaps it's time to point the gun at yourselves gun owners? Well not literally. Regardless of the arguments for or against guns one fact is indisputable: There is a death toll from gun related crimes that is causing a real concern in many communities. Just like any other type of crime that toll needs to be reduced rather than just accepted as the norm. Who better to tackle it than responsible gun owners?

It's not enough to say you already have gun control laws, gun safety and education programs. Or even that there are gun education and safety programs for kids. All of that only targets people who have every intention of being responsible gun owners. What are you doing to reduce the number of illegal guns and illegal gun owners? What are you doing to prevent emotionally unstable people from using their legally obtained guns to lash out at the world?

I really think the onus is on gun owners to practically demonstrate that an armed country is a safer country - because that's their logic.

My question is, if a gun owner is in a situation where they could've saved lives by using their gun and they don't... can I hold them accountable for not taking action?

That's right. If you're carrying a gun and you don't take a pro-active stance to save lives in a hostile situation can I sue you? Can I hold you accountable since you've embraced gun ownership as a way to make the country safer? Or is your argument just lip service?

Or worse yet, if you do take a pro-active stance and actually put lives at risk because you didn't disarm the hostile person but instead provoked them into firing shots, can I sue you for putting lives in danger?

At this point I feel like I'm just musing possibilities. The list of What if it all goes wrong is always longer than the one where it all turns out okay.

My point is, if you want to own guns without the backlash then you need to be doing much more than just teaching people how to handle and fire a weapon safely. You need to get actively involved in reducing gun crime or at the very least supporting organisation who are.

It's not good enough to point to your right to own a gun and say that makes the country a safer place because 36 years ago I don't like Mondays happened. I'm pretty sure there are more gun owners now than there was then and mass shootings still happen quite frequently depending upon whose stats you believe.


Comments


Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Post: MY SOOPER DOOPER NEW CONSERVATORY/ART STUDIO!

Today's guest post is by Artist, Writer, and Mental Health Advocate, Jo B Creative who writes for her blog, Creating My Oddessey.

You should see our (almost) brand new conservatory, half of which is my art studio. 'Lucky me!' I think to myself. Not every creative bod can boast that. It's HUGE! Like a giant greenhouse.

We first moved to our pleasant cul-de-sac house - great for raising kids - when our son, who's on the cusp of thirty-one, was four. One of the main reasons that we wanted it was that, apart from its location on the fringes of a historic market town in rural Hampshire, UK, it had a sizable conservatory looking onto the back garden. It was brown wood framed and had a corrugated transparent roof sloping down from downstairs ceiling height. On the face of it, it doesn't sound that glamourous, but we loved the idea of a conservatory. Luxury! I even liked the red brick walls which it was built against - the original exterior of the house - and the light …

Finding Time to Skate - Swap a Skateboard Session into Your Weekly Workout Routine

A common problem among skaters dealing with work/life commitments (typically older skaters with families, careers, or both) is finding the time to actually spend on a skateboard. In fact, life in general getting in the way of skateboarding, is what often leads so many to drop out of the sport, only to rediscover it later, once everything else starts to even out.

I'm certainly in that category. Never really giving skateboarding away altogether but only using a skateboard to get from A to B, when I didn't have a vehicle, for many years. In the last couple of years I've been trying to get back into the sport properly, i.e. building up my trick list and skating for fun and not just to get from A to B.

The problem is I have so many interests, projects, paid work, and more, that I would often leave skateboarding to the end of my day. Kind of as something to look forward to. Except I wouldn't be that motivated to really improve because my mind would be fried from everything …

The Lego Man - He's got all that!

Who would have thought that owning one of the worlds largest, private Lego collections could take you so far. Tom Lucieer of Angaston, South Australia, not only has met the Queen (of England) but is a frequent guest of her majesty and family when they are in Australia. He's also met Prince Charles, Lady Diana and Camila Parker-Bowles. Not only that, he grew up with TV Vet, Dr Harry, and is a friend of the Irwin family (yes, that's Steve Irwin's family).

Tom will happily tell you all this as part of the guided tour of his collection, which, aside from Lego, includes much railway memorabilia and colourful anecdotes about days gone by, his achievements and more. Frequently he will finish each particular monologue with the phrase, "Have you got that?", just to check that he hasn't confused you because, as he points out, his display and the stories behind it are a lot to take in at once.

In the photo you can see Tom holding a special award, which I think is for bein…

Creating a Mobile Independent Artist Business - Part 10: Opportunities to make money (Part A)

In my last post I looked at What to Create and Finding Your Market. This post is something of a natural follow on from finding your market as many of these money making opportunities include their own market places that you can research to see what kinds of themes and subjects sell best.

It's worth doing this research to find out if the art you're already creating is a good fit for that market place - which is ideal - or if you may have to consider expanding your interests to cover popular themes in order sell in a particular market.

12 Side Hustle Ideas You Won't Overthink and Can Start Right Now

Have you been thinking about starting a side hustle to earn a bit of extra money but haven't been able to make a start because of everything you don't know about running your side hustle yet, or because of other things you think you have to do first?

If this is you then chances are, what you're really doing is making excuses not to start. I can't start anything new until I cross a few more things off my to do list. Sound familiar?

I'm too busy to start my side hustle and don't have the time to work on it just now.
One reason you may be stalling is a perceived notion that your side hustle is actually too complicated, and is going to require a lot of research and education before you're even ready to make your first dollar.

Here are some side hustles you can start in the next hour or two for low or even no cost. You don't need to know the ins and outs of everything you just need to start, everything else is 'on the job' training. It doesn't m…

Movie Review: Avengers: Infinity War (2018) *Spoiler Free*

Ten years in the making and Marvel finally releases part one of the Avengers versus Thanos, A.K.A. Avengers: Infinity War.

After seeing all 18 films in the MCU prior to this, and liking most of them, I was pretty confident this movie would not disappoint.

Other than a few minor issues - that are all my personal taste and in no way reflect on the quality of the film - it really delivers. Thanos is indeed the big, bad villain of the MCU that we've been antcipating.

Movie Review: Spider-Man - Into the Spider-verse (2018) *No Spoilers*

I didn't go see Spider-man: Into the Spider-verse in theatres because a) Sony, and b) Animated movie... and if there's a c) Sony + Spider-man.

Then I started hearing all this word of mouth that this movie is really good so I thought, 'yeah, still not going, I'll wait for the home release'.

Then it won all these awards including an Oscar for Best Animated Feature... so I guess this movie must be good...right?

I rarely see animated features in the cinema because I have little faith in them to deliver enough entertainment at an adult level. Especially movies like Into the Spider-verse which you know is skewing for a younger demographic (as all Spider-man films in general do due to the popularity of the character with kids).

Having bought this movie on DVD (which is why I'm reviewing it now) I don't regret not having seen it in theatres, even though it would have looked amazing on a big screen.

The animation style is what really makes this film stand out. If I…