Skip to main content

COVID-19: Not Vaccinated Does Not Equate to 'Anti-vaxxer'. There's Many Reasons People May Be Cautious About Getting Vaccinated

The Pandemic before vaccines (and probably after too). Photo by Thirdman from Pexels.
The Pandemic before vaccines (and probably
after too). Photo by Thirdman from Pexels.

Remember when the pandemic first started? How we didn't have a vaccine for over a year, yet we were still able 'flatten the curve' through hygienic practices like handwashing, mask wearing, social distancing, and, in the really critical periods, lockdowns?

Australia, and several other countries are in the strong position we are today thanks to those practices and not vaccines. Yet, there appears to be a growing perception that unvaccinated people are threatening everyone's health because of their higher risk of catching COVID-19.

However, while you might think getting vaccinated is a no brainer, as you 'state the obvious' statistic that more deaths occur from COVID-19 in people who have not been vaccinated. I think, I would certainly hope so because you'd really be wondering, what is the point of getting vaccinated, if there was a high number of deaths from COVID-19 among people who have been vaccinated. In addition there is still plenty of unknowns around the vaccines that is cause for hesitation.

A statistic that is less thrown around is the numbers of people who have been vaccinated that have still gotten COVID-19. You don't hear about them much because they're more of an anomaly than proof of the vaccine not being effective. That is, with any vaccine, there will always be some people for who it just doesn't work, for varying reasons.

More concerning a number that is thrown around is the people who have died from receiving the vaccine. Specifically, it seems, one particular type of vaccine (AstraZeneca triggering a rare blood clotting condition). While claims of large numbers of deaths, in some countries, as a direct result of receiving the vaccine have been debunked, there are still deaths, and often it's unclear if it was a direct result of the vaccine or other underlying issues. 

For example, the elderly in most countries have been prioritized, with some of these people dying after receiving their jabs. It's not conclusive if the vaccine contributed to their deaths, or if they would have died anyway from old age or other underlying medical issues.

Needless to say people dying from the vaccine have been enough of a concern for our government to argue over who should be allowed to receive which vaccine since, if anyone is likely to die from it, it had better not be anyone under 50 years of age.

The vaccines themselves are still very much under review as to how effective they are, and what kind of longevity they have in protecting people from COVID-19. How long after your two jabs can you go before you need another two jabs?

Then there's the potential side effects of receiving the vaccine, which range from none to you may be feeling quite unwell for a day or two with some unpleasant but manageable symptoms.

Slightly more concerning is the new development of, apparently, now being okay to have your two jabs be one of each vaccine? That doesn't seem safe to me at all for drugs that are still being field tested?

Granted this thinking is based on actual research studies, but it's still new research that isn't necessarily conclusive. Why do we even need two jabs of one type of vaccine if one of each will do? Why isn't one jab enough if the second jab can be something else? 

Supposedly two different jabs boost your immune system more than two jabs of the same vaccine. (To me this logic is heading, borderline, into the ill advised patient thinking of taking more of a drug will cure you faster than sticking to the recommended doses).

The biggest, anxiety inducing issue for me, is the push to get people vaccinated as quickly as possible, not so much for health reasons (though of course that is a main one, right?) but more so we can 'get back to normal'.

People want to go out, be in large gatherings, go to events, do business, travel, and all the things we used to do without having to worry about spreading a virus. I get that, and I want those things too.

However I don't think we need to start demonizing people for being cautious about getting vaccinated. The majority of people who have yet to be vaccinated are not 'anti-vaxxers'. Unless they are but, statistically, it is unlikely. 

At the time of writing this the Australian population was roughly 35% vaccinated, a figure that includes people who have only received one dose of vaccine. In terms of actual people, that's just over ten million.

Also at the time of writing this, South Australia is in the tail end of a seven day lockdown. Our state has  been particularly diligent with making sure the pandemic doesn't get out of control using the tried and effective method of social distancing, masks, handwashing, and lockdowns. 

Until this recent lockdown, due to the COVID Delta strain, we were 'getting back to normal'.

As of Monday, July 26, we had just 26 active cases in the state despite, in April of this year, our vaccine roll out was called out as being one of the slowest by our Federal government - yet our lockdowns are few, short, and our cases of COVID have been manageable. Vaccine's are great but it's not yet the vaccine that's making a big impact.

One could argue that it's unvaccinated people that are spreading the Delta strain - though I suspect that's closer to a 'fact' than an 'argument'. We were down to zero cases in the community in South Australia, with the delta virus being brought in from overseas, and subsequently spread via close contact. Which suggests the most effective short term method for wiping out COVID is being more cautious with people coming into the country and taking decisive action when outbreaks occur.

My overall, meandering point here is, before getting vaccinated, there's a lot to think about. I am not an anti-vaxxer at all but I'm not rushing out to be vaccinated. I don't consider myself to be high risk for catching COVID-19 because I barely go out, even before the pandemic started (with exception to travel holidays which, obviously, we haven't done since the beginning of 2020). When I do go out I practice social distancing and I sign in everywhere I'm supposed to. I am being cautious.

Face Masks Matter Thank you for Wearing
Face Masks Matter,
Thank You for Wearing by TET.
Available from Redbubble.

In everyday life I'm mostly at home. I work from home. I walk the dog once a day. The pandemic was not a drastic change for me. My partner is considered an essential worker, so our household hasn't had any issues economically either.  We might go out for dinner every so often or see a movie, both types of venues have adapted to social distancing regulations relatively well.

I will likely get vaccinated at some point, since I am eligible, but I've been concerned about the whole 'vaccine blood clotting' issue, since blood clotting has been a health issue in our family in the past. 

I also believe, there are people more in urgent need of a vaccine than me (pretty much anyone who doesn't spend the majority of their time at home all year, not speaking to anyone other than their immediate family).

While I don't particularly agree with the idea of 'vaccine passports' that seem to have entered the national discussion. I think that is very likely to become a thing for international (and probably interstate) travel. We can't ask people coming into the country to get tested and/or vaccinated if we're not prepared to do so ourselves.

That said I think proof of a negative COVID test, at both ends of the journey if necessary, is a better option than proof of having been vaccinated (since vaccination, at this point, doesn't necessarily stop you from carrying the virus).

I do think it is unnecessary to make it mandatory to be vaccinated just to enter a store or place of business, restaurant, or cinema, given social distancing practices not just appear to work but have been the backbone of our fight for more than a year.

Long term, vaccinations are likely the key to eradicating COVID-19. I'm choosing to wait before getting vaccinated. Until it feels a little less Russian Roulette and a little more science fact on the things concerning me. 

In the meantime, don't assume I, and people like me, must be anti-vaxxers (and who says anti-vaxxers aren't responsibly social distancing, wearing masks etc.). We're not crazy, we're cautious, and we're not stopping the vaccinated from going to packed out stadiums like pre-pandemic days... because chances are, the majority of us, who aren't vaccinated, don't want to take the risk of being somewhere we can't social distance...

...unless, of course, you aren't confident in the vaccine keeping you safe... because you're sure it will, right? Or maybe, even if you've had the vaccine, going to a packed stadium, may not be the best idea?


Note: This article is based purely on opinion, my own observations, and my interpretation of various media on the subject of the pandemic and COVID vaccines. It is intended to be a representation of what the average person, who is not in any way a medical professional or scientist, may be weighing up in their head in relation to vaccines and getting vaccinated. I fully support the idea of vaccines, I'm just not there yet on COVID vaccines, and I know I'm not alone in that thought process thanks to conflicting media reports, even across so called reputable sources.

On a further note: I fully support the roll out of brain melting 5G towers during lockdowns if it'll fix my internet speed, regardless of whether the pandemic is a fake conspiracy to allow Bill Gates to microchip everybody who gets vaccinated, so he can mind control the world population into being part of the new world order. I'm not sure what this order is going to be but lord knows we could do with some that's new. I look forward to being ruled by sentient space lizards... though that seems a bit same ol' same ol' to me... or maybe I've been watching too much Loki on Disney+?


Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

James Gunn's Social Media Monkeys Joke Was a Highlight of His Superman Movie For Me

B efore James Gunn's Superman Movie was released there was a whole rumor going around that the movie would feature monkeys on computers trolling Superman's social media, sparking much outrage. #supersh*t. I didn't know this was even a thing until just prior to writing this article. I did a search to see if anyone had posted a clip of the monkeys scene from the movie and got pages of discourse featuring videos and articles prior to the film. Most of it from Gunn detractors (let's say) seeing it as some kind of childish swipe at them... well not them specifically but, you know, those other people who have every right to hate on anything sight unseen. Anyway, I'm not going to give even one such example a link or air because it's kind of sad watching someone devote so much commentary to a throw away gag that is absolutely a nod to James Gunn's Superman trolls.  The whole reason this post exists, is to say I loved the joke, because fourteen years ago, and I...

Movie Review: A Complete Unknown (2024) *No Spoilers*

Y ou would think the Bob Dylan story would be 'wind-swept and interesting,' to quote Billy Connelly, however, despite  A Complete Unknown  being quite an engaging film, it feels like it missed the years that really shaped him as a song writer/performer. The film starts in 1961, with a then unknown, 19-year-old Bob Dylan (Timothée Chalamet) arriving in New York City with his guitar.  From there he forges relationships with musical icons on his meteoric rise, culminating in a groundbreaking performance that reverberates around the world. The problem being, according to this film, Dylan arrived in New York, for the most part, fully formed as a folk singer/song writer. In virtually no time he makes a very important connection that puts him on the trajectory of doing the work and becoming a name, before making his world changing performance. While there is some drama behind the scenes with his various relationships, none of it is particularly unique to any number of up and com...

Movie Review: Hellboy: The Crooked Man (2024) *No Spoilers*

I  would not call myself a comic book fan of Hellboy. I've never read a single comic about him. My sum total knowledge of the character comes from the first two live action films, Hellboy (2004) and Hellboy II: The Golden Army (2008), staring Ron Pearlman in the titular role. Essentially I'm a fan of those two films. Particularly Ron's portrayal of the character. I've been wanting to see the two later reboot attempts, in particular, David Harbor's run at the character in, Hellboy (2019), but reviews suggested I'd be disappointed if I spent any extra on them beyond a streaming service subscription. I missed David's Hellboy when it was on streaming, and currently I think you can only rent or buy it. However, Hellboy: The Crooked Man (2024) surfaced, at no extra cost on Amazon Prime, so I decided to give it a go. The poster says it's the fourth installment in the franchise, so I guess these films are loosely set in the same continuity and are all the sa...

I'm Joining the Illuminati Brotherhood By Personal Invitation of Hiltom Rothschild... Wait, What?

How special am I to have finally come of age (53 years young) and am now eligible to participate in building the world alongside other members of the Illuminati Brotherhood... Yes I've received the call by way of an email, which I'm sure is real because I had to translate it from the Dutch language and it was personally written by Hiltom Rothschild, one of the non-existent members of the Rothschild family (or perhaps deep undercover because Google has never heard of them?). A Transcript of the email below: To: etourist From: Illuminati Brotherhood  Subject: Illuminati Broederschap (Illuminati Brotherhood) I am Hiltom Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild family, one of the 13 families of the Illuminati brotherhood. I'm here to let you know that you've come of age and are eligible to participate in building the 🌎 world. It is a calling and a privilege to honor him with pride and gratitude as not everyone will ever be chosen by the LIGHT, many are called but few are ch...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Movie Review: Superman (2025) *No Spoilers*

T he one thing I like about James Gunn as a comic book movie director is that he leans into the comic book nature of the world and the characters.  He's not trying to do a realistic take on any of the characters. He's simply bringing the comics to life. It's still his take on the characters, but he doesn't shy away from their comic book origins. James Gunn's  Superman  is very much a comic book movie in every sense. Nothing is off the table because it's too 'comic-booky' and might look silly in a live action film.  To me that's incredibly liberating. It lets James actually tell a proper Superman story that isn't hamstrung by reality, or tip toeing into the fantastical just enough to allow Superman to exist in the real world. Superman begins in the middle of a battle. Metropolis is under attack by a super powered being known as 'Hammer of Boravia', however everything is not as it seems, and Superman (David Corenswet) must work with other s...

Movie Review: Joker: Folie à Deux (2024) *No Spoilers*

I t was with good reasons I didn't see the Joker  (2019) sequel, Joker: Folie à Deux , in cinemas.  While I did like the first film, I've never rewatched it, and have no desire to see it again any time soon. It was a little too graphically violent and generally a depressing story overall for me. Add to that, every single review I read for the sequel effectively panned the film, with the common theme being "...this movie is a big middle finger to DC fans." Subscribing to HBO Max, for season 2 of Peacemaker , gave me access to the Joker sequel. Time to see if this movie was really as bad a everyone said it was. Joker: Folie à Deux centers around Arthur Fleck's (a.k.a. The Joker) (Joaquin Phoenix) trial for the murders he committed in the first film, along with his growing relationship with a fellow, female inmate at Arkham Hospital, Lee (Lady GaGa). While I can definitely see why DC fans thought this movie was a complete misfiring train wreck of a film, I'm goin...