Skip to main content

Movie Review: Mad Max Fury Road - What a Lovely Movie!

The trailers for Mad Max Fury Road promised something bigger and better than any of the previous Mad Max films. It not only lives up to the promise it delivers more than you could ever imagine, short of being director George Miller himself.

Honestly, after watching the film, I not only felt I'd been entertained, I also felt like the non stop action had taken its toll and worn me out too, in a good way, like I wasn't just a passive observer.


The basic premise sees Max (Tom Hardy) caught up in an escape attempt by Furiosa (Charlize Theron) and the wives of, desert Warlord, Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne), who no longer wish to be his breeders and personal property.

Once Joe realizes his wives are gone the chase is on and it barely slows down. Certainly the stakes are always high and relentlessly baring down on the escapees at all times.

It sounds deceptively simple but within that there is so much going on, so many ideas, characters, settings, cars and constant movement that your mind will be racing along trying to take it all in. There are also a few surprises, Easter eggs and, if you're a long time viewer of Australian television, quite a few unexpected casting choices to enjoy.

The film is a little like George Miller took the best ideas from Mad Max 2 (The Road Warrior) and mixed in some of the best ideas from Mad Max 3 (Beyond Thunderdome) and turned the whole thing up to eleven. Then, when eleven wasn't enough, he custom made an amplifier, stuck it on the back of a truck, put it in the movie and made it breathe fire. It's a bonker's ride of a film but it all just works.

If you're a fan of the previous films the only real issue you may have is whether Tom Hardy works as Max.

Like many Mad Max fans I would've loved to have seen Mel reprise his role. Given the age of many of the key supporting actors, and the fact that Hugh Keays-Byrne was the Toecutter in the very first film alongside Mel, Mel's age definitely wasn't stopping him from being involved.

From the very beginning it's obvious Tom Hardy isn't trying to be a version of Mel Gibson as Max. I do think he's tried to find some kind of middle ground vocally between his Max and Mel's, with an accent that I found a little distracting in the few times that he does actually speak more than a few grunts. However I got used to it.

I will say that Tom didn't seem to have as much of a presence in this film as Mel does in the earlier films. I'm fairly certain Mel's Max had more to say and people tended to look to him more for answers too. I may be wrong as it's been a while since I watched any of the previous films.

The lesser presence is not entirely Tom's fault. He's a very charismatic actor whom I've enjoyed in other films. This particular Mad Max movie is a team up film of equals. Tom's Max shares the screen with Charlize Theron's Furiosa, who is as compelling and capable as Max. Everyone is looking to both of them for answers. Together they deliver memorable performances.

Some people have suggested this movie is a feminist movie dressed up as an action flick. My response to that is, who cares. Maybe it could be seen that way but its also unapologetically a Mad Max movie. Mad Max films since The Road Warrior have always had strong, capable female characters. Fury Road is really just building on that foundation like it does with everything else. It's basically more of everything you know along with many new ideas that fit right in with the folklore of the series.

I could easily talk about this film for many more paragraphs but I'd have to start spoiling the film. If you're a Mad Max fan you'll love this installment and be looking forward to the next two or three that Tom Hardy is signed up for.

If you like fast paced action and/or car films, George Miller at his best makes the Fast and Furious series look like a Sunday drive. Honestly, I've tried to watch the Fast and Furious movies because the trailers look awesome but I just can't get into the actual films. I want to but I just don't see what the fans of those movies are seeing. No such problem with Fury Road.

If you've never seen a Mad Max film but think Fury Road looks like fun, go see it. The best thing about Mad Max is you can pretty much jump in at any point as all the films are stand alone stories. The only caveat here is that the first three may look a little hokey after seeing Fury Road given this is the first Mad Max movie since 1985.

I can safely say there's nothing like this film on the big screen today. Limited dialogue, 80% practical stunt work, great character development, fantastic world building, brilliant cinematography and more. Everyone bought their 'A' game to this film and it really shows.



Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

Bruce, South Australia - A Forgotten Aussie Town with Spectacular Landscape Views and Potential

The Bruce Railway Station. Now a private residence. V isiting the almost forgotten town of Bruce reminds me of visiting Silverton back in 2007, except Silverton has been revived into a kind of arts town with a very famous pub. Bruce, on the other hand seems a little too spread out, and a bit too out of the way to make a similar 'arts' kind of revival. Bruce's Pub appears to be an art studio with signs of restoration work in progress. The main part of town appears to be the Bruce railway station (now a private residence) and a pub, also privately owned and possibly was, or still is, and artist studio. Other buildings and homesteads are set fairly wide apart, and are mostly privately owned homes. You don't get much sense of being in a town as such. I'm told there are approximately 14 local residents/families? Once earmarked to be a commercial centre, Bruce fell by the wayside after successive floods and drought in its early years. Obviously the railway line is no lo...

Is AI Art 'Art'? The Say NO to AI Art Movement, and Why Human Artists Will Adapt

AI Art No T-Shirt by TET Also available on other items . Right now there is a big debate over not just whether AI art is 'art' but whether AI's are actually ripping off the work of actual human artists, without their consent, to create their images - particularly images 'in the style of' specific artists. From my own observations this debate started to get more traction when artist's signatures began appearing in the output of AI Art  image generators. Is It Art? Cool Froyd the Cat Sketch by TET. My style is very much influenced by classic Disney and WB character styles. To get some clarity on how real human artists work (of which I am one)... we, that is all of us... take influences from the art that has come before. i.e. whatever artists we like, have studied, seen etc. we are influenced by. It shows up in our work, intentionally or not. If you really study my own cartoony art style you'll see I'm heavily influenced by early Disney and Warner Bros cart...

Kids today are smarter than their parents?

Mother's Bed Art Board Print by TET. Available from RedBubble . How often have you heard it said that kids today are smarter than their parents? I’ve heard it quite frequently in the media – even Dr Phil has said it. I say speak for yourself. It’s not true and don’t let the media fool you. Today’s kids may have access to more information that may give them more choices but in my experience, they only take in what they want to hear and still make stupid, uninformed decisions. Just like we used to at their age. Like any cross section of people there will be exceptions. There are kids that are genuinely smarter, more mature and responsible for their age. However the vast majority know everything they need to know by the time they turn fourteen. They’re ‘adult’ enough to be responsible for all their own decision making so parents should just let them do what they please…right? Just like we thought at fourteen. Don’t be fooled. Just because your son knows how to download MP3’s onto an i...

James Gunn's Social Media Monkeys Joke Was a Highlight of His Superman Movie For Me

B efore James Gunn's Superman Movie was released there was a whole rumor going around that the movie would feature monkeys on computers trolling Superman's social media, sparking much outrage. #supersh*t. I didn't know this was even a thing until just prior to writing this article. I did a search to see if anyone had posted a clip of the monkeys scene from the movie and got pages of discourse featuring videos and articles prior to the film. Most of it from Gunn detractors (let's say) seeing it as some kind of childish swipe at them... well not them specifically but, you know, those other people who have every right to hate on anything sight unseen. Anyway, I'm not going to give even one such example a link or air because it's kind of sad watching someone devote so much commentary to a throw away gag that is absolutely a nod to James Gunn's Superman trolls.  The whole reason this post exists, is to say I loved the joke, because fourteen years ago, and I...

Embarrassing Yourself with Doof Doof Music

Ever since Spinal Tap popularized the notion of turning an amp up to eleven audio systems have been rising to the challenge of louder, more awesome sound. In particular, car audio systems have embraced the notion of the bigger the noise the better the sound must surely be. What I'd like to know is, if these sound systems are so good, why do they make all music sound the same... Doof, Doof, Doof? You've all heard them. Pimped up cars, with audio systems seemingly worth more than gold, volume blasting way past eleven. Sound waves booming long before you make a positive visual on the car... Doof, Doof, Doof. It has to be the audio system right? Surely all these people can't be playing the same tune? Doof, Doof, Doof. Could it be that the more money spent on a car sound system the less musical range it will actually play? Maybe these people can't afford to buy music after purchasing the audio system so they all play the same demo track? Doof, doof, doof. In my own car I hav...

Boom Crash Opera Born Classic But Not Again

Boom Crash Opera are an Australian Band that reached the peak of their popularity in the mid to late nineteen eighties. They are a band that I knew about at that time but was never really excited by until they released their ill fated double album Born and Born Again in 1995 (Album cover pictured). At the time of its release I was very much into emerging Australian musical acts and was also looking out for new sounds that were different and had kind of a futuristic/electronic sound. Artists that I was buying at the time included; Swoop , Nine Inch Nails and Pop Will Eat Its Self . As well as a really interesting release by David Bowie, the concept album, Outside . Born was a fairly radical departure for Boom Crash Opera (BCO). The first single, Gimme , was often compared to the sounds of Gary Glitter, particularly his single, Rock n Roll part 2 , because of the pounding drum loops. Watch the video below. My favorite single from the album is dissemble which probably went now...

Movie Review: Avatar: Fire and Ash (2025) *No Spoilers*

J ames Cameron's Avatar movies are one of the few I'll pay to watch in a cinema without knowing anything about the story. Largely because I know they'll at least be visually interesting and worthy of seeing on a big screen.  That was the case for the third installment,  Avatar: Fire and Ash . I may have seen a trailer at some point in the lead up to its release but I'm not sure? All I could definitely tell you is, in the second movie we were introduced to water tribes, and in this movie we were going to be introduced to fire tribes. Which is really all you need to know in hindsight. The movie does get you up to speed with the key throughlines from Avatar: The Way of Water pretty quickly (well quickly for a three hour Avatar movie). You may even be able to watch this without seeing the first two because it's not entirely necessary to know the history of the characters for this installment. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his family are still being pursued by Colon...