Skip to main content
Now building my TET.Life Store.

Nuclear Power Won't Reduce Your Electricity Bill Like You Think - Australia's Energy Crisis

Cooling towers of a nuclear power station.
Photo: Petr Kratochvil
Australian energy consumers are currently in a crisis, receiving some of the highest power bills in the world, making us a prime target for the nuclear energy vultures who claim their industry will bring the cost of electricity down.

It's a smoke and mirrors argument when you consider the cost of actually producing electricity isn't the main reason for Australia's ever increasing consumer electricity prices. Hypothetically, even after the cost of installing nuclear power plants, the actual cost reductions won't be as dramatic as the nuclear energy industry would have you believe.

According to this article, A high price for policy failure: the ten-year story of spiralling electricity bills by David Blowers, published in January 2018, the two biggest factors are the cost of the network (transporting electricity), and the retailer margins (cost of billing and servicing the customer). These are followed by the wholesale cost (actually generating the power), and the environmental schemes we pay for through our electricity bills.

Overall, according to the ACCC we're paying 44% more for electricity than we were ten years ago.

Also, according to David's article the cost of the network has increased from $42 billion in 2005 to $72 billion by 2016 (an increase of 70%) despite there being no significant change in the number of customers using the network over that time period. Which means we're actually paying for infrastructure that was built but we didn't actually need (seemingly thanks in part to government incentives that encourage energy companies to build more infrastructure whether we need it or not).

Being an energy retailer is big business and, far from competition causing prices to drop, instead companies are spending more and more on marketing and passing those costs along to the very people they're competing for, the consumer.

If you've ever wondered about retailer mark ups there's a good comparison in this article by Bulk Energy, Australian electricity prices; the cost of electricity in Australia per kWh, published in June 2018. As you'll see all the markups are pretty high with the highest being South Australia at 383%.

Whilst these markups sound ridiculously high they don't necessarily translate into similarly high profit margins. Apparently these markups are essential to cover the cost of running their business.

Regardless the point of this post is to highlight that there are faster ways to cut the cost of electricity bills than building nuclear power stations... and to debunk the idea that nuclear is the answer to spiraling costs.

Government reforms in the two main key factors could significantly reduce energy costs for consumers without the need to build anything at all (least of all more network infrastructure that we don't need). Apparently it's easier to build things than it is to build good policies. Just look at that massive Tesla Battery the SA government commissioned to keep the lights on (which is, apparently saving the state money).

I feel there's a push by Nuclear Energy companies and their supporters to leverage the current crisis, attempting to get their foot in the door to change Australia's ban on nuclear energy. These companies are promising cheaper prices, and still pedalling the line that Nuclear is a 'clean' energy source because it supposedly has zero carbon emissions... which is like saying coal is a clean energy source because it produces zero radioactive waste.

It's foolish to swap one toxic power source for another that is equally, if not a more toxic, when there are actual cleaner, safer alternatives. These alternatives may not yet be able to completely takeover from current 'base' power sources but if nuclear gains a foothold here, what incentive will there be to develop renewable energy alternatives to the necessary levels required?

Australia will never become a world leader in renewable energy if we fall for the seemingly easy and unnecessary option of nuclear power. There's an argument that by not having nuclear power Australia is being left behind but, with real incentive to develop renewable energy, we're actually positioned to lead the way in making them viable sources of base energy, instead of supplementary.

As much as the media and the nuclear industry tries to tell you the fear of a nuclear meltdown is the reason we have a zero tolerance for nuclear power, I believe it's the idea of living near a nuclear waste storage facility that really turns people off.

The chance of a meltdown is minimal with only three actual nuclear meltdowns since nuclear power stations became a thing. Living next door to a nuclear waste centre is a fact. Someone has to. The trouble is most Australians don't want to, and the rightful landowners are right to say 'not in our backyard either'.

Saying yes to nuclear energy will not reduce the cost of your bill in the short term since it takes time to build nuclear power plants and, realistically, how many would you need to make a dent in prices nationally?

By the time they are built our government could have got their finger out and actually created policy reform to bring prices down, and then we'd be stuck with more network infrastructure (i.e. nuclear power plants/waste disposal centres) that we didn't need in the first place and now have to pay for.

---o ---o--- o---

If you're interested in investigating the issue of Nuclear Energy in Australia further there is a great page on the Parliament of Australia's website that covers much of the history of the issue in this country as well as the pros and cons of using nuclear energy. 

You can also read my opinion piece on South Australia's investigation into the possibility of setting up a commercial nuclear waste facility in our state that would have potentially stored waste from power plants worldwide.

Comments


Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Post: MY SOOPER DOOPER NEW CONSERVATORY/ART STUDIO!

Today's guest post is by Artist, Writer, and Mental Health Advocate, Jo B Creative who writes for her blog, Creating My Oddessey.

You should see our (almost) brand new conservatory, half of which is my art studio. 'Lucky me!' I think to myself. Not every creative bod can boast that. It's HUGE! Like a giant greenhouse.

We first moved to our pleasant cul-de-sac house - great for raising kids - when our son, who's on the cusp of thirty-one, was four. One of the main reasons that we wanted it was that, apart from its location on the fringes of a historic market town in rural Hampshire, UK, it had a sizable conservatory looking onto the back garden. It was brown wood framed and had a corrugated transparent roof sloping down from downstairs ceiling height. On the face of it, it doesn't sound that glamourous, but we loved the idea of a conservatory. Luxury! I even liked the red brick walls which it was built against - the original exterior of the house - and the light …

Kids today are smarter than their parents?

How often have you heard it said that kids today are smarter than their parents? I’ve heard it quite frequently in the media – even Dr Phil has said it. I say speak for your self. It’s not true and don’t let the media fool you.

Today’s kids may have access to more information that may give them more choices but in my experience, they only take in what they want to hear and still make stupid, uninformed decisions. Just like we used to at their age.

Like any cross section of people there will be exceptions. There are kids that are genuinely smarter, more mature and responsible for their age. However the vast majority know everything they need to know by the time they turn fourteen. They’re ‘adult’ enough to be responsible for all their own decision making so parents should just let them do what they please…right? Just like we thought at fourteen.

Don’t be fooled. Just because your son knows how to download MP3’s onto an ipod, or your daughter can chat to five friends at the same time on he…

Boom Crash Opera Born Classic But Not Again

Boom Crash Opera are an Australian Band that reached the peak of their popularity in the mid to late nineteen eighties. They are a band that I knew about at that time but was never really excited by until they released their ill fated double album Born and Born Again in 1995 (Album cover pictured).

At the time of its release I was very much into emerging Australian musical acts and was also looking out for new sounds that were different and had kind of a futuristic/electronic sound. Artists that I was buying at the time included; Swoop, Nine Inch Nails and Pop Will Eat Its Self. As well as a really interesting release by David Bowie, the concept album, Outside.

Born was a fairly radical departure for Boom Crash Opera (BCO). The first single, Gimme, was often compared to the sounds of Gary Glitter, particularly his single, Rock n Roll part 2, because of the pounding drum loops. Watch the video below.



My favorite single from the album is dissemble which probably went nowhere on the char…

What If Being Yourself Isn't Good Enough?

One of my most personal public videos is a collection of outtakes edited together with my narration, read word for word, from my blog post written back on August 5th, 2007 titled Is Being Me Good Enough? I made the similarly titled video the next day.

At the time the video (which you can view below) generated some discussion in the comments and was a real turning point for me personally in how I thought about myself and how I presented on camera. It took a weight off my shoulders.


[Note that especially for this article I've re-edited and re-uploaded the video to Youtube because the last sentence on the original version was cut off by Youtube's uploader. The new version is identical other than I've added a title screen at the beginning and cropped the footage for 16:9 ratio - plus added some length to the end to ensure it doesn't get the last line cut again.]

I came to be thinking about this video again because of my latest video diaries - which I will be the first to a…

"You are the Generation that bought more shoes..."

"You are the generation that bought more shoes, you get what you deserve." This quote is a song lyric that I heard on the radio (my apologies to the writer and artist that it belongs too because I don't know who either of you are). It's a great line and I can only assume it refers to the apparent lack of interest today's eighteen to twenty somethings appear to have in more serious and deeper issues.

Not that I'm trying to hold myself up as someone who campaigns strongly for the greater good of human kind or that I spend significant amounts of time raising awareness of important issues. I'm certainly not a poster boy for changing the attitudes of people with too many shoes but lyrics like that do make you think.

It's at this point that I really don't know where to go with this article. Should I focus on the material nature of modern society and its obsession with having more stuff? Or should I mention a few important issues, like Human Rights Abuses,…

Multiculturalism, Muslims and Australian Immigration

Recently a friend sent me (and a number of others on their email list) the following chain email, that has been circulating around Australian email boxes, asking for my opinion on the message.

Just before you read it I'll pre-warn you that it relates to immigration laws and ideas that I'm sure many countries are grappling with in this post 911 world.

I've reproduced the email as closely as I can to how I received it, complete with large typeface. Have a read and then read my response. The email is titled 'Go the Dutch'. The comment in red is by the last person to forward the email to my friend.


About time the Australian government did the same......why do we suck up to these people whose "values" are from beyond the dark ages ,who still live the way they did 2000 years ago. 

Go the Dutch - but why wait until 2013?

The Netherlands, where six per cent of the population is now Muslim, isscrapping multiculturalism:

The Dutch government says it will abandon the l…

Momentary pauses in cyberspace...

I got to thinking about blogs and the fact that anyone can leave a comment to my posts. When someone comments, the polite thing to do is to respond with a comment under theirs. This may prompt an additional comment but really that person has no real intention of in depth discussion. They're just passing through.

It's a lot like walking down the street with a complete stranger approaching from the opposite direction. Your intention is to simply pass them by but as you come within talking distance the stranger says 'Hi, nice day isn't it.' Like they needed to share that little highlight of information to brighten your day too.

You can smile and nod in agreement, or go so far as to say 'Yes isn't it' whilst passing by without so much as a break in stride. It's all that is required to be polite.

Sometimes though, you want a bit more from your stranger. Why did they decide to say 'Hi' to you? Unfortunately you can't back track and ask your stran…