Skip to main content

Nuclear Power Won't Reduce Your Electricity Bill Like You Think - Australia's Energy Crisis

Cooling towers of a nuclear power station.
Photo: Petr Kratochvil
Australian energy consumers are currently in a crisis, receiving some of the highest power bills in the world, making us a prime target for the nuclear energy vultures who claim their industry will bring the cost of electricity down.

It's a smoke and mirrors argument when you consider the cost of actually producing electricity isn't the main reason for Australia's ever increasing consumer electricity prices. Hypothetically, even after the cost of installing nuclear power plants, the actual cost reductions won't be as dramatic as the nuclear energy industry would have you believe.

According to this article, A high price for policy failure: the ten-year story of spiralling electricity bills by David Blowers, published in January 2018, the two biggest factors are the cost of the network (transporting electricity), and the retailer margins (cost of billing and servicing the customer). These are followed by the wholesale cost (actually generating the power), and the environmental schemes we pay for through our electricity bills.

Overall, according to the ACCC we're paying 44% more for electricity than we were ten years ago.

Also, according to David's article the cost of the network has increased from $42 billion in 2005 to $72 billion by 2016 (an increase of 70%) despite there being no significant change in the number of customers using the network over that time period. Which means we're actually paying for infrastructure that was built but we didn't actually need (seemingly thanks in part to government incentives that encourage energy companies to build more infrastructure whether we need it or not).

Being an energy retailer is big business and, far from competition causing prices to drop, instead companies are spending more and more on marketing and passing those costs along to the very people they're competing for, the consumer.

If you've ever wondered about retailer mark ups there's a good comparison in this article by Bulk Energy, Australian electricity prices; the cost of electricity in Australia per kWh, published in June 2018. As you'll see all the markups are pretty high with the highest being South Australia at 383%.

Whilst these markups sound ridiculously high they don't necessarily translate into similarly high profit margins. Apparently these markups are essential to cover the cost of running their business.

Regardless the point of this post is to highlight that there are faster ways to cut the cost of electricity bills than building nuclear power stations... and to debunk the idea that nuclear is the answer to spiraling costs.

Government reforms in the two main key factors could significantly reduce energy costs for consumers without the need to build anything at all (least of all more network infrastructure that we don't need). Apparently it's easier to build things than it is to build good policies. Just look at that massive Tesla Battery the SA government commissioned to keep the lights on (which is, apparently saving the state money).

I feel there's a push by Nuclear Energy companies and their supporters to leverage the current crisis, attempting to get their foot in the door to change Australia's ban on nuclear energy. These companies are promising cheaper prices, and still pedalling the line that Nuclear is a 'clean' energy source because it supposedly has zero carbon emissions... which is like saying coal is a clean energy source because it produces zero radioactive waste.

It's foolish to swap one toxic power source for another that is equally, if not a more toxic, when there are actual cleaner, safer alternatives. These alternatives may not yet be able to completely takeover from current 'base' power sources but if nuclear gains a foothold here, what incentive will there be to develop renewable energy alternatives to the necessary levels required?

Australia will never become a world leader in renewable energy if we fall for the seemingly easy and unnecessary option of nuclear power. There's an argument that by not having nuclear power Australia is being left behind but, with real incentive to develop renewable energy, we're actually positioned to lead the way in making them viable sources of base energy, instead of supplementary.

As much as the media and the nuclear industry tries to tell you the fear of a nuclear meltdown is the reason we have a zero tolerance for nuclear power, I believe it's the idea of living near a nuclear waste storage facility that really turns people off.

The chance of a meltdown is minimal with only three actual nuclear meltdowns since nuclear power stations became a thing. Living next door to a nuclear waste centre is a fact. Someone has to. The trouble is most Australians don't want to, and the rightful landowners are right to say 'not in our backyard either'.

Saying yes to nuclear energy will not reduce the cost of your bill in the short term since it takes time to build nuclear power plants and, realistically, how many would you need to make a dent in prices nationally?

By the time they are built our government could have got their finger out and actually created policy reform to bring prices down, and then we'd be stuck with more network infrastructure (i.e. nuclear power plants/waste disposal centres) that we didn't need in the first place and now have to pay for.

---o ---o--- o---

If you're interested in investigating the issue of Nuclear Energy in Australia further there is a great page on the Parliament of Australia's website that covers much of the history of the issue in this country as well as the pros and cons of using nuclear energy. 

You can also read my opinion piece on South Australia's investigation into the possibility of setting up a commercial nuclear waste facility in our state that would have potentially stored waste from power plants worldwide.

Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

TV Series Review: The Office - Australia (Prime Video) (2024) *No Spoilers*

W hile I'm a late comer fan of The Office, only watching after the original and USA versions were both available on streaming services, I did watch them in the order of release i.e. I watched the U.K. version first. Now, with the release of the Australian version of The Office on Prime Video, I think it's best to approach watching this new version understanding that it is not those shows. More importantly, remembering the US version was not well received or as popular as it has become since streaming became a thing. I personally remember people often saying the original version was better, back in the day. Of course, the Australian version has analogues for all the same characters you're familiar with from the previous versions, with their characteristics, so you can easily see who is the Aussie version of each character. While there are actually 13 different adaptations of the series worldwide, I was surprised to learn this is the first time the boss has been female. No...

TV Series Review: Velma (2023-2024) *No Spoilers*

A s a kid, Scooby Doo cartoons were something I used to watch fairly regularly. I wasn't a diehard fan but it was one of the better, of the many, cartoons I used to watch. I had heard about the new animated series, Velma , around the time of its release but it wasn't coming out on any streaming service I was subscribed to so it went off my radar pretty quickly. Quite by chance I signed up to a streaming service so I could watch DC Entertainment's, The Penguin, and noticed Velma was on that platform. I figured I may as well get my money's worth out of the subscription. I did know that Velma, herself, had been race swapped for the show, which made no real difference to me, though I do prefer classic Velma if pushed to choose. However the first episode of season one was a real shock to my expectations! No where had I heard this series was skewing very much into adult humor and themes. I was expecting something more along the lines of the original Scooby Doo show. Instead I...

Trump's 2024 Election Win Will Change Everything - At Least I Sure Hope It Does!

Trump by Leonardo.ai & TET A s an outsider looking in on the US 2024 election, right up until election day, it is beyond my belief that the election continued to be a 'close race'. It is even further beyond my belief that Trump won, without question.  Even if the Democrats wanted to claim the election was rigged somehow (which I'm sure Trump was gearing up to do had the outcome been different) it would be hard to make the case, beyond a recount. There's no slim margin here. Trump clearly won. While I would've preferred a Blue win, I at least got one outcome I was hoping for. A clear winner on election day. If I could give the Democrats some free, unsolicited advice for the next election. Stop targeting the opposition as if they're somehow selfish, evil villains. That's not how political parties work. At the end of the day the all represent the public. The people. The everyday citizen who you're trying to convince that you have what it takes to meet t...

Movie Review: Memory (2023)

S omething a little different for me in terms of movies I usually review,  Memory  is a film I was invited along to see by my partner, and both of us didn't know much about the movie going in, other than it was a film where one of the leads has dementia. The basic premise follows adult, special needs social worker, Sylvia (Jessica Chastain), who leads a simple and structured life. When Saul (Peter Sarsgaard) follows her home from their high school reunion the surprise encounter profoundly impacts both of their lives. The film starts out very awkward and disjointed to some degree, which I feel is intentional, to reflect that Sylvia, who is also a struggling single mother, is fairly resilient, she is, in many ways, just barely holding everything together because she doesn't have any other option. When Saul sees Sylvia at their high school reunion it seems like some unpleasant memories from her past are fast tracked into the forefront of her life, and things move forward fro...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Movie Review: Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (2023) *No Spoilers*

I f you're like me and didn't go to see  Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom  in theatres you made the right choice. For context, I loved the first Aquaman movie . It's one of my favorites from the Snyder/DCEU era. It is a relatively well made adventure story, with some fantastic world building, amazing visuals, and included some commentary on  environmental issues as well. Despite having, mostly the same creative team, Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom comes across as a film that couldn't decide what it wanted to be, in terms of a sequel. On the one hand it wants to showcase the cool, fun, wisecracking, but bad ass, rock'n'roll  version of Aquaman (Jason Momoa) with another rollicking adventure. On the other it feels like someone said it had to be epic with potentially world changing stakes so Aquaman would have to do 'King Shit' and be all serious, navigate deep sea politics, and generally try to be a responsible heroic good guy that he is when he's not being ...

Optimus Robots, Self Driving Cars and Buses - Tesla's 'We Robot' Event and the Evolution of Optimus

Tesla Optimus Robot Serving Guests. Image: Tesla O n the tenth of October Tesla held their 'We Robot' event, which I guess is the new incarnation of their previous Tesla AI Day annual event. There were three much talked about reveals, the driverless taxis, a driverless bus, and Optimus robots moving around the event, fully interacting with people 'on the ground'. Tesla Driverless Taxi. Image: Tesla While it was cool to see so many driverless taxis, that you could get in and experience for yourself as they drove around the Warner Brothers lot, and the driverless bus was something of a surprise reveal nobody expected, my attention was on Optimus. Tesla Driverless Robovan. Image: Tesla It was in September of 2021 that Elon Musk first announced his plan to create an affordable, humanoid, domestic robot, that would eventually be in homes worldwide. That vision was underlined with a person wearing a robot suit, that wasn't as well received as Elon may have liked, despite...