Kevin Rudd Vs Julia Gillard and the Australian Media

Kevin Rudd is not an idiot. He's certainly not delusional as media magnate, Rupert Murdoch, supposedly said about Kevin's leadership challenge of the Labor party and, ultimately the position of Australian Prime Minister.

For my international readers, our government has been in the throws of a supposed leadership challenge by ex (and ousted) Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, for months. All of which came to a head over the last weekend where Kevin finally resigned as our Foreign Minister and announced he would be making a challenge.

Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, announced the Labor party would be holding a ballot on Monday morning at 10am, in which Kevin lost his challenge 31-71 votes. You can read a blow by blow account of how Monday went down on the Sydney Morning Herald's website, Live: Labor leadership challenge - Gillard vs Rudd (Tip: start from the bottom and work up the article, which is in blog format - newest info first).

Kevin knew, long before he made his challenge, he had next to zero chance of winning. Every political commentator in the Australian media said so and most even had the approximate number of votes Kevin was likely to get about right. Even Kevin himself was quoted as saying he expected to loose this ballot according to ABC1's Media Watch Show which aired on the 27th February 2012.

The Australian Media have been hounding Kevin Rudd about the possibility of a leadership challenge for months. Speculating when he is best likely to make a challenge so as not to be too close to the next election. Kevin may have even toyed with the idea of actually making a challenge at some time in the past but was never really serious about it. Or maybe he was... I don't know?

What I do know is that the media have been building this story to the point where nothing else the government does matters much any more. It's all about the Leadership and who's more popular with the Australian public. Who gives a toss.

Even now, after Julia's decisive win, the media is focusing on retribution. Will Prime Minster Gillard bring down the axe on everyone that voted for Rudd and send them all to the back benches? Seriously. Julia has already said she's about unifying the party and getting on with government with a view to winning the next election decisively. Retribution is hardly a unifying step forward.

As a voting member of the Australian public I'm perfectly happy with Kevin as Foreign Minister. In fact I think he should be reinstated. He's clearly the best person for the job with his ties in the Asia/Pacific region.

Julia's not my favorite person for PM. She's too diplomatic and constrained by her party advisers. In fact the best thing about the leadership challenge has been hearing Julia actually sound like she's speaking her mind instead of the party line. She's no Bob Hawke or Paul Keating... yet.

Whether or not those two former PM's spouted the party line or not you at least felt like the words coming out of their mouths were what they believed in - almost to the point of it sounding like it was all their ideas.

But back to Kevin. I have no doubt he wants to be Australian Prime Minister again. He's a career politician very much in the same mould as former Liberal PM, John Howard, who is one of politics great survivors. John went through various ups and downs over many decades with the Liberal party before finally becoming one of its most successful leaders and Prime Ministers.

It is only my opinion but, since Kevin knew he had next to no chance of winning a leadership ballot, he probably only challenged simply to shut the Australian media up on the issue. In doing so, his support within the Labor party would be crystallized into a clear number that shows the majority of the party are not actually dissatisfied with Julia in the top job. (As the Australian media seem to want us to believe).

Even if Kevin never makes another challenge during this government's term he knows he's still got a shot at the leadership of the Labor party at some point in the future. He knows he's popular with the people, he's the most experienced person in the Labor cabinet and he's not about to resign. Whatever his party don't like about him, he can work on. Perseverance - that's what the life and times of PM Howard's rise to the top can teach Kevin.

Kevin is not an idiot. He may have talked up his chance at actually winning the ballot purely to put on a show. Apparently Kev's good at that. Being one thing in public and another when the media isn't on him. This challenge needed to look serious in order to shut the media up.

Kevin's not disappointed. Julia's not upset with him. Everyone goes back to the business of government with the obligatory cabinet reshuffle so the media can read more into that than there actually is and, hopefully, the news can report on real issues.

The Australian media are mostly a big disappointment. They want to turn the news into some kind of soap opera that they imagine is entertaining for their readers. Especially when it comes to government. Like government is some kind of reality show.

Your average Australian only cares about who is their preferred Prime Minister when they have to vote in an election. Do we really need a running poll on who's popular this week as PM? Or which party would win if an election was held today? It's meaningless crap.

The fact is we voted on the government we have and that's what we got. I just want to know what they're doing as a government and whether the things they're are doing are working. I want to know what the people opposing the government are saying and what they think the government should be doing as an alternative.

I don't need yet another photo opportunity of opposition leader, Tony Abbott, out in the community trying to mangle together some quote about the government in relation to whatever bit of machinery it is he's trying to operate this week. Tony, for heaven's sake, stop setting up photo opportunities and start planning a proper alternative government. Opposition isn't just saying 'No it isn't' (ref: Monty Python's 'Argument sketch').

There seems to be a perception in the media that politics is boring so it has to be made interesting with drama otherwise people won't care. As Henry Rollin's once said about TV "They're spitting on your mind".

There are so many interesting aspects of government that affect people daily. Why can't we see more of that as the headlining story instead of who's more popular as PM this week?

Comments

Movie Review: Superman (2025) No Spoilers

T he one thing I like about James Gunn as a comic book movie director is that he leans into the comic book nature of the world and the characters. He's not trying to do a realistic take on any of the characters. He's simply bringing the comics to life. It's still his take on the characters, but he doesn't shy away from their comic book origins. James Gunn's Superman is very much a comic book movie in every sense. Nothing is off the table because it's too 'comic-booky' and might look silly in a live action film. To me that's incredibly liberating. It lets James actually tell a proper Superman story that isn't hamstrung by reality, or tip toeing into the fantastical just enough to allow Superman to exist in the real world. Superman begins in the middle of a battle. Metropolis is under attack by a super powered being known as 'Hammer of Boravia', however everything is not as it seems, and Superman (David Corenswet) must work with other s...

James Gunn's Social Media Monkeys Joke Was a Highlight of His Superman Movie For Me

B efore James Gunn's Superman Movie was released there was a whole rumor going around that the movie would feature monkeys on computers trolling Superman's social media, sparking much outrage. #supersh*t. I didn't know this was even a thing until just prior to writing this article. I did a search to see if anyone had posted a clip of the monkeys scene from the movie and got pages of discourse featuring videos and articles prior to the film. Most of it from Gunn detractors (let's say) seeing it as some kind of childish swipe at them... well not them specifically but, you know, those other people who have every right to hate on anything sight unseen. Anyway, I'm not going to give even one such example a link or air because it's kind of sad watching someone devote so much commentary to a throw away gag that is absolutely a nod to James Gunn's Superman trolls. The whole reason this post exists, is to say I loved the joke, because fourteen years ago, and I...

Movie Review: A Complete Unknown (2024) No Spoilers

Y ou would think the Bob Dylan story would be 'wind-swept and interesting,' to quote Billy Connelly, however, despite A Complete Unknown being quite an engaging film, it feels like it missed the years that really shaped him as a song writer/performer. The film starts in 1961, with a then unknown, 19-year-old Bob Dylan (Timothée Chalamet) arriving in New York City with his guitar. From there he forges relationships with musical icons on his meteoric rise, culminating in a groundbreaking performance that reverberates around the world. The problem being, according to this film, Dylan arrived in New York, for the most part, fully formed as a folk singer/song writer. In virtually no time he makes a very important connection that puts him on the trajectory of doing the work and becoming a name, before making his world changing performance. While there is some drama behind the scenes with his various relationships, none of it is particularly unique to any number of up and com...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices. My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe? Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

I'm Joining the Illuminati Brotherhood By Personal Invitation of Hiltom Rothschild... Wait, What?

How special am I to have finally come of age (53 years young) and am now eligible to participate in building the world alongside other members of the Illuminati Brotherhood... Yes I've received the call by way of an email, which I'm sure is real because I had to translate it from the Dutch language and it was personally written by Hiltom Rothschild, one of the non-existent members of the Rothschild family (or perhaps deep undercover because Google has never heard of them?). A Transcript of the email below: To: etourist From: Illuminati Brotherhood Subject: Illuminati Broederschap (Illuminati Brotherhood) I am Hiltom Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild family, one of the 13 families of the Illuminati brotherhood. I'm here to let you know that you've come of age and are eligible to participate in building the 🌎 world. It is a calling and a privilege to honor him with pride and gratitude as not everyone will ever be chosen by the LIGHT, many are called but few are ch...

Australian Federal Election 2025 - World's Most Boring Government Re-elected by Landside - We're Even More Fine!

Anthony Albanese Victory by ChatGPT and TET. W hen I started writing about the 2025 Federal election the polls were suggesting the world's most boring government was crusing to a defeat . As it turns out, boring is good, and Australia wants more of it, handing the current government a landslide win with a majority vote. Anthony Albanese became the first PM since John Howard to win a consecutive term, and the first Labor PM since Bob Hawke to do so. Some of that comes down to the leadership revolving door both major parties had through the mid 2000s. Although Anthony is my preferred PM over Dutton the irony is Dutton sounds more like a leader with a fairly commanding voice and an ability to speak well, without sounding like he's waffling and dodging questions, even if he is. Anthony, on the other hand, does have the ability (and speech writer) to say a lot of inspiring things but it gets lost in the delivery. He doesn't seem to know when to emphasise a point for effect. In h...

Unitree's R1 Humanoid Robot Brings the Cost of Advanced Robotics Hardware Down to Less Than USD$6000 (Robot Uprising Update)

Unitree's R1 Humanoid Robot. The first humaniod robot prices under USD$6000. C hinese robotics developer, Unitree, has launched the Unitree R1 Robot , an advanced humanoid machine, for under USD$6000. Standing at 5'5", this very agile robot walks with a very natural 'human' gait, and can easily perform cartwheels or get up from a fall. It is controlled by AI and is capable of conversation but also comes with a remote control (so you can turn it off if it starts asking about someone named 'Sarah Connor'). Rather than me describe it, watch AI Revolution's video (below) to see it in action and hear their take on why this robot is a big deal. China’s New AI Robot Is So Good and Cheap It’s Scary: Unitree R1 - AI Revolution You'll notice that the robot doesn't have proper, human like hands, but apparently this is an option you can purchase as an extra (dexterous hands are listed as 'optional' on educational versions of the robot on Unitree...

TET.Life (The Extraordinary Tourist Life)

Search This Blog