Skip to main content

Movie Review: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) *No Spoilers*

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga One Sheet

This is another film that I would have liked to have seen in a theatre but, for whatever reason, didn't get to. Having now seen Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) almost a year later I'm glad I didn't.

Which is not to say it's bad. Like its predecessor Mad Max: Fury Road (2015), which I enjoyed in a cinema immensely, this film would definitely benefit from being on a big screen for the spectacle and epic visuals of it all. 

However unlike its predecessor there is so much going on, with back and forth between the waring parties, and Furiosa's story as well, you can't just sit back and kind of enjoy the ride.

It's like writer/director, George Miller, wanted to cram in as many of his ideas as possible for the post apocalyptic world of Mad Max, because it's not likely he'll make another one, but whoever does, has a rich, detailed world of on screen source material to draw upon.

The story begins with young Furiosa (Alyla Browne) and her journey from the relative safety of her home, in the land of abundance, into the wastelands. From there the film is broken up into chapters and passages of time until, about an hour in, we finally see Anya Taylor-Joy as the young women version of the character.

Paralleling, and crossing into, Furiosa's journey is Dementus (Chris Hemsworth), a fairly competent warlord leader, looking to take over the major resource centers of the desert wasteland.

Everything you liked from the previous film is here, the cars, the stunts, the weird and wonderful characters, all new world building, and more. All of it is great, except you've seen so much of it already.

What's missing is the simplicity of the story, and, dare I say it, Max.

Max is the focal point of all the Mad Max films. He's the guy we're rooting for. He's the reluctant, wandering hero who turns up to help save the day. He kind of shared the screen in Fury Road, but Furiosa was somehow more relatable in that film. To the point that George Miller felt she needed an origin story that I don't think anybody was asking for. I certainly wasn't.

Don't get me wrong, Furiosa is a great character but, if anything, I would've rather seen her have another reason to team up with Max than go through her origin.

In Furiosa it's harder to relate to her. Partly because, for the first half of the movie, she's a child, and just kind of does what she can to survive. By that point you're wondering, is Anya Taylor-Joy even in this movie?

When Anya does finally appear, while the transition isn't jarring, you are aware Furiosa is a different actor to the one we've tried to invest our time with for a whole hour.

Even though we've seen her whole backstory, we never really get emotionally invested in her struggle, since she never really feels like she's in a situation that she's desperate to get out of. She just kind of goes with the flow - until she loses an arm (not a spoiler since you already knew she was missing an arm from the previous film).

Dementus is the only other character in the film we really spend any time with. It's probably one of Chris Hemsworth most interesting roles, particularly because he's a very talkative character who likes to think he's more sophisticated than he actually is.

While Chris is doing some great work, his character is not one you'll identify with, or have empathy for, because, while you could say he's almost likeable, nothing is really done to help you understand his point of view.

In a story that has so much going on, very little time is spent on character development. It's mostly about setting up what each character wants, and watching how they get there.

I feel this movie suffers in a similar way to how Mad Max II and Mad Max III feel like very different films with shared elements. Mad Max II is a very simple story of a town in its final days, where as Mad Max III brings a lot more world building, ideas, and storylines into play that are sort of Mad Max adjacent but held together because Max is actually a main character in that movie.

In the same way, Fury Road is a pretty simple story of an escape, except it is expertly told with incredible world building and straight up bonkers, new ideas. Furiosa takes that toy box and builds it out even more, creating a richer world, but forgetting this is a movie about Furiosa. She's there, but she isn't driving the story, like she and Max do in the previous film.

If anything this is should've been a story about Max versus Dementus, set after Fury Road (or even before). Only Furiosa's presence as a child requires this to be a prequel. Take her out of the story and it could be set almost any time. Everything looks the same as in Fury Road.

This could have been as good as Fury Road, and probably only needed a tighter edit. It's too long at two and a half hours. 

As a series that primarily appeals to a male audience, I found the first hour of watching young Furiosa not particularly engaging. Everything we learn about her could have been told with brief flashbacks and well placed exposition. It might of made for some good character development if we gradually learned how Furiosa came to be in her predicament so Anya could've been on the screen, causing mayhem, from the beginning (rather than her child self who seems too competent for someone who has grown up in an abundant community).

Overall, the ideas were definitely there for a great sequel. The movie certainly has some stand out action sequences and stunts. Chris is clearly enjoying his role, while Anya does eventually become the more familiar version of the character you came to see. You just kind of wish she got there sooner.

Great for all the world building aspects that some future director, or maybe even George Miller if he has another Mad Max film in him, can build upon but maybe get back to basics with a less complex script.


Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

Movie Review: Superman (2025) *No Spoilers*

T he one thing I like about James Gunn as a comic book movie director is that he leans into the comic book nature of the world and the characters.  He's not trying to do a realistic take on any of the characters. He's simply bringing the comics to life. It's still his take on the characters, but he doesn't shy away from their comic book origins. James Gunn's  Superman  is very much a comic book movie in every sense. Nothing is off the table because it's too 'comic-booky' and might look silly in a live action film.  To me that's incredibly liberating. It lets James actually tell a proper Superman story that isn't hamstrung by reality, or tip toeing into the fantastical just enough to allow Superman to exist in the real world. Superman begins in the middle of a battle. Metropolis is under attack by a super powered being known as 'Hammer of Boravia', however everything is not as it seems, and Superman (David Corenswet) must work with other s...

James Gunn's Social Media Monkeys Joke Was a Highlight of His Superman Movie For Me

B efore James Gunn's Superman Movie was released there was a whole rumor going around that the movie would feature monkeys on computers trolling Superman's social media, sparking much outrage. #supersh*t. I didn't know this was even a thing until just prior to writing this article. I did a search to see if anyone had posted a clip of the monkeys scene from the movie and got pages of discourse featuring videos and articles prior to the film. Most of it from Gunn detractors (let's say) seeing it as some kind of childish swipe at them... well not them specifically but, you know, those other people who have every right to hate on anything sight unseen. Anyway, I'm not going to give even one such example a link or air because it's kind of sad watching someone devote so much commentary to a throw away gag that is absolutely a nod to James Gunn's Superman trolls.  The whole reason this post exists, is to say I loved the joke, because fourteen years ago, and I...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Movie Review: A Complete Unknown (2024) *No Spoilers*

Y ou would think the Bob Dylan story would be 'wind-swept and interesting,' to quote Billy Connelly, however, despite  A Complete Unknown  being quite an engaging film, it feels like it missed the years that really shaped him as a song writer/performer. The film starts in 1961, with a then unknown, 19-year-old Bob Dylan (Timothée Chalamet) arriving in New York City with his guitar.  From there he forges relationships with musical icons on his meteoric rise, culminating in a groundbreaking performance that reverberates around the world. The problem being, according to this film, Dylan arrived in New York, for the most part, fully formed as a folk singer/song writer. In virtually no time he makes a very important connection that puts him on the trajectory of doing the work and becoming a name, before making his world changing performance. While there is some drama behind the scenes with his various relationships, none of it is particularly unique to any number of up and com...

I'm Joining the Illuminati Brotherhood By Personal Invitation of Hiltom Rothschild... Wait, What?

How special am I to have finally come of age (53 years young) and am now eligible to participate in building the world alongside other members of the Illuminati Brotherhood... Yes I've received the call by way of an email, which I'm sure is real because I had to translate it from the Dutch language and it was personally written by Hiltom Rothschild, one of the non-existent members of the Rothschild family (or perhaps deep undercover because Google has never heard of them?). A Transcript of the email below: To: etourist From: Illuminati Brotherhood  Subject: Illuminati Broederschap (Illuminati Brotherhood) I am Hiltom Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild family, one of the 13 families of the Illuminati brotherhood. I'm here to let you know that you've come of age and are eligible to participate in building the 🌎 world. It is a calling and a privilege to honor him with pride and gratitude as not everyone will ever be chosen by the LIGHT, many are called but few are ch...

Australian Federal Election 2025 - World's Most Boring Government Re-elected by Landside - We're Even More Fine!

Anthony Albanese Victory by ChatGPT and TET. W hen I started writing about the 2025 Federal election the polls were suggesting the world's most boring government was crusing to a defeat . As it turns out, boring is good, and Australia wants more of it, handing the current government a landslide win with a majority vote. Anthony Albanese became the first PM since John Howard to win a consecutive term, and the first Labor PM since Bob Hawke to do so. Some of that comes down to the leadership revolving door both major parties had through the mid 2000s. Although Anthony is my preferred PM over Dutton the irony is Dutton sounds more like a leader with a fairly commanding voice and an ability to speak well, without sounding like he's waffling and dodging questions, even if he is. Anthony, on the other hand, does have the ability (and speech writer) to say a lot of inspiring things but it gets lost in the delivery. He doesn't seem to know when to emphasise a point for effect. In h...

Second Sunday Skateboard Session Episode 9, and 10 - Shuv-it Revelation and Did I Improve?

T he final two episodes of my ten part YouTube series documenting my process of learning the first seven basic skateboard tricks from Braille Skateboarding's, Skateboarding Made Simple. These are the links to  Episode One ,  Episode Two ,  Three to Five , and Six to Eight , should you feel the need to see where I started or you want a bit more background on my personal skateboarding journey that began in 1988. I won't ramble on in this final introduction to my last two sessions, other that to say, episode ten is the highlight in terms of getting a direct comparison from episode 1 with side by side footage. Episode 9 - Frontside Pop Shuv-it Revelation The only episode not filmed on the second Sunday, thankfully due to the weather raining Sunday out and not my lack of willingness to continue. Monday was also very rainy but I managed to fit my session in during a small window of no rain late in the day. It was a little bit of a difficult session in that I could only uti...