Skip to main content
Now building my TET.Life Store.

Movie Opinion: Let's Talk About Indiana Jones Movies (Probably Spoilers)

I love the character of Indiana Jones played by Harrison Ford. Recently I bought a DVD box set of all four Indiana Jones movies so I could finally have them in my film collection.

With Indiana Jones 5 ramping up production, and set to be released in 2021 (after being pushed back from 2020) it seems like a good time to look back at the previous four films.

I won't be reviewing each film. Chances are, if you're reading this, you've either seen them, or decided not to see them based upon the reviews when they were released. I just had some thoughts about each film for discussion.

General consensus is that Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and The Last Crusade (1989) are the best two of the series, followed by Temple of Doom (1984), and probably the least favorite, Kingdom of the Crystal skull (2008).

Raiders of the Lost Ark


As the first movie it's the most important of the series. People often say The Last Crusade is the better movie, and it is, but only if you've seen the first one. Raiders establishes everything about Indiana Jones as a character that gets carried through to all of the other films.

Even though it was made in 1981 it's still very watchable today. Largely because it's a period piece. It doesn't make any modern references that might date it. The special effects in the climax are a little dated compared to films of today but still compelling to watch the techniques used all the same.

There is a theory going around (that I first heard on the TV show The Big Bang Theory) that the movie would've had the same out come without Indiana Jones and that somehow this diminishes the events of the film.



I guess it depends on what you think the point of the movie is?

Sure Indy fails to secure the Ark but is that the point of the film? It can be argued that The Last Crusade and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull both would also have had the same outcome with their MacGuffins without Indy. In each case it would have just taken the people looking for them longer to get there.

The point of these movies is to follow Indy's adventures. Whatever the outcome, it's about the journey and the people. It's about action and escapism. It's about watching Indy solve puzzles and make discoveries whilst racing against people looking for the same thing. It's not about winning.

In fact Raiders sets up, right from the beginning, that Indy often finds the treasure but loses it to a competitor at the eleventh hour. That's part of what makes the character compelling. Despite being very capable, he doesn't always win in the end.

Temple of Doom


The first Indiana Jones movie I saw in a theatre. I remember liking it at the time but was aware that it didn't quite live up to the first movie.

These days people say that the film is somewhat racist with its cultural stereotypes. I was going to comment that I didn't think it was racist but then I read some articles on why it is, and I kind of agree. At the very least its stereotypes are culturally and gender insensitive.

Stereotypes exist for a reason and not all of them are offensive. Most have an underlying truth to them, and only seem to offend if they aren't positive stereotypes. Indiana Jones himself has become a stereotype that, in this day and age, is starting to become an issue for diversity in movie heroes (white male who is very capable and often gets the girl - you don't have to think to hard for how often you've seen that).

Temple of Doom does have several negative stereotypes; poor, defenceless Indian villagers, Indian Cult leaders and henchmen, Asian Gang members, and, of course, comedy relief, Short Round, and Willie Scott.

None of them are particularly offensive in and of themselves, it's only when you view them as a representative of their culture and/or gender that they really become an issue. None of the characters are out of place in what is essentially a film trying to emulate a B movie from the 1950's.

In many of the articles I read, discussing the racist/gender inequality aspects, most agree the film is still very watchable and a lot of fun, rather than offensive.

The Last Crusade


I don't have a lot to say about The Last Crusade other than it was genius to make it a father son story, and brilliant casting to put Sean Connery in the role of Indy's Dad.

The opening flashback scenes with young Indy really establish their relationship, though it's a little corny that adult Indy bases his adventurer outfit on a guy he had a run in with as a teen (and how most of Indy's character traits were all founded in one event from his youth).

Otherwise it's a solid film, the best of the series, but even better if you've seen the first movie.


The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


Probably the least liked of the series, and likely the reason Harrison Ford and Steven Spielberg are even considering another movie in the franchise. The character deserves to go out on a high.

People were sceptical that Harrison would be too old to play Indy at this point, and he kind of is, but I think he just manages to prove otherwise in this film.

Whether he can do that again in Indy 5 is going to be even more of a stretch but if you see the behind the scenes of Indy 4, Harrison is still pretty spry, climbing up the large crates in the warehouse scene effortlessly.

I enjoyed the alien theme for this film. There's plenty of theories amongst ufologist that the human race is actually descended from aliens, citing evidence in actual hieroglyphs and other art from ancient times. The concept also fits well with the 1950's B movie aesthetic of the Indy franchise.

Where it all started to go wrong, in my opinion, was the film's attempt to recreate a reversal of the father son relationship from The Last Crusade. Not a bad idea in itself, just executed poorly. We get to meet Mutt (Shia Labeouf) fairly early in the piece, and it doesn't take long work out he's Indy's son well before Indy finds out.

We don't really get to see the father/son dynamic until halfway into the film which I think was a big miss for me. Indy get's no time to digest he has a son and no time to explore that relationship by the time he finds out.

It was hinted that Mutt might become the new Indy but thankfully they didn't follow through on that idea. The character didn't earn the title at all. (Not to mention I'm just not a Shia fan. He can act but, even now he's older I have no desire to see him play an Indiana Jones like character, Indy son or total reboot of the franchise).

The other main issue this movie had was an over reliance on CGI but I'd dispute that. Whilst the CGI wasn't great in a franchise that didn't need it this much, what really brought the film down was CGI sequences bordering on the ridiculous - Shia swinging through the jungle with monkeys was the worst offender for me.



Indy movies have always been over the top with their action pieces but, no matter how unbelievable they are, there's always an element of 'yeah, maybe that's possible... for Indy'. Crystal Skull kind of lost sight of that, particularly in the fridge sequence, and the final three waterfalls sequence.

The end of this film is also kind of, what was the point of it all? Just like the first movie, you would've got the same result as far as the Crystal Skulls go without Indy. Then I remind myself it's about the journey not the goal.

Whilst it was great seeing Indy reunited with Marion (Karen Allen), probably the best part of the film, overall it didn't focus nearly enough on the character relationships the way The Last Crusade did. The fact it ended with a wedding suggested strongly that Indy was finally going to settle down and live the quiet life.


Indiana Jones 5


Indy 5 is meant to begin shooting in April of 2019 according to director Steven Spielberg. Harrison Ford is confirmed to be reprising his role as Indy.

One could argue that Harrison is too old to play Indy, particularly by 2019, but it really depends on what version of Indy you're thinking about. He's not Raiders Indy anymore, but he is still very close to Crystal Skull Indy. A guy who clearly isn't as able bodied as he used to be but can still take a punch.

That said, one angle the film could take would be to properly cast 'Junior' in the 'Senior' role and team him with an aspiring Indy type (maybe even a female Indy type). Shia isn't supposed to be reprising his role, though I wouldn't be opposed to him getting another shot at Mutt with a better character arc.

It is supposed to be Harrison's last time in the role so whatever they do, I hope it's epic, and just plain fun adventure. I'll definitely be looking forward to it.

Comments


Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Post: MY SOOPER DOOPER NEW CONSERVATORY/ART STUDIO!

Today's guest post is by Artist, Writer, and Mental Health Advocate, Jo B Creative who writes for her blog, Creating My Oddessey.

You should see our (almost) brand new conservatory, half of which is my art studio. 'Lucky me!' I think to myself. Not every creative bod can boast that. It's HUGE! Like a giant greenhouse.

We first moved to our pleasant cul-de-sac house - great for raising kids - when our son, who's on the cusp of thirty-one, was four. One of the main reasons that we wanted it was that, apart from its location on the fringes of a historic market town in rural Hampshire, UK, it had a sizable conservatory looking onto the back garden. It was brown wood framed and had a corrugated transparent roof sloping down from downstairs ceiling height. On the face of it, it doesn't sound that glamourous, but we loved the idea of a conservatory. Luxury! I even liked the red brick walls which it was built against - the original exterior of the house - and the light …

Kids today are smarter than their parents?

How often have you heard it said that kids today are smarter than their parents? I’ve heard it quite frequently in the media – even Dr Phil has said it. I say speak for your self. It’s not true and don’t let the media fool you.

Today’s kids may have access to more information that may give them more choices but in my experience, they only take in what they want to hear and still make stupid, uninformed decisions. Just like we used to at their age.

Like any cross section of people there will be exceptions. There are kids that are genuinely smarter, more mature and responsible for their age. However the vast majority know everything they need to know by the time they turn fourteen. They’re ‘adult’ enough to be responsible for all their own decision making so parents should just let them do what they please…right? Just like we thought at fourteen.

Don’t be fooled. Just because your son knows how to download MP3’s onto an ipod, or your daughter can chat to five friends at the same time on he…

Boom Crash Opera Born Classic But Not Again

Boom Crash Opera are an Australian Band that reached the peak of their popularity in the mid to late nineteen eighties. They are a band that I knew about at that time but was never really excited by until they released their ill fated double album Born and Born Again in 1995 (Album cover pictured).

At the time of its release I was very much into emerging Australian musical acts and was also looking out for new sounds that were different and had kind of a futuristic/electronic sound. Artists that I was buying at the time included; Swoop, Nine Inch Nails and Pop Will Eat Its Self. As well as a really interesting release by David Bowie, the concept album, Outside.

Born was a fairly radical departure for Boom Crash Opera (BCO). The first single, Gimme, was often compared to the sounds of Gary Glitter, particularly his single, Rock n Roll part 2, because of the pounding drum loops. Watch the video below.



My favorite single from the album is dissemble which probably went nowhere on the char…

What If Being Yourself Isn't Good Enough?

One of my most personal public videos is a collection of outtakes edited together with my narration, read word for word, from my blog post written back on August 5th, 2007 titled Is Being Me Good Enough? I made the similarly titled video the next day.

At the time the video (which you can view below) generated some discussion in the comments and was a real turning point for me personally in how I thought about myself and how I presented on camera. It took a weight off my shoulders.


[Note that especially for this article I've re-edited and re-uploaded the video to Youtube because the last sentence on the original version was cut off by Youtube's uploader. The new version is identical other than I've added a title screen at the beginning and cropped the footage for 16:9 ratio - plus added some length to the end to ensure it doesn't get the last line cut again.]

I came to be thinking about this video again because of my latest video diaries - which I will be the first to a…

"You are the Generation that bought more shoes..."

"You are the generation that bought more shoes, you get what you deserve." This quote is a song lyric that I heard on the radio (my apologies to the writer and artist that it belongs too because I don't know who either of you are). It's a great line and I can only assume it refers to the apparent lack of interest today's eighteen to twenty somethings appear to have in more serious and deeper issues.

Not that I'm trying to hold myself up as someone who campaigns strongly for the greater good of human kind or that I spend significant amounts of time raising awareness of important issues. I'm certainly not a poster boy for changing the attitudes of people with too many shoes but lyrics like that do make you think.

It's at this point that I really don't know where to go with this article. Should I focus on the material nature of modern society and its obsession with having more stuff? Or should I mention a few important issues, like Human Rights Abuses,…

Multiculturalism, Muslims and Australian Immigration

Recently a friend sent me (and a number of others on their email list) the following chain email, that has been circulating around Australian email boxes, asking for my opinion on the message.

Just before you read it I'll pre-warn you that it relates to immigration laws and ideas that I'm sure many countries are grappling with in this post 911 world.

I've reproduced the email as closely as I can to how I received it, complete with large typeface. Have a read and then read my response. The email is titled 'Go the Dutch'. The comment in red is by the last person to forward the email to my friend.


About time the Australian government did the same......why do we suck up to these people whose "values" are from beyond the dark ages ,who still live the way they did 2000 years ago. 

Go the Dutch - but why wait until 2013?

The Netherlands, where six per cent of the population is now Muslim, isscrapping multiculturalism:

The Dutch government says it will abandon the l…

Momentary pauses in cyberspace...

I got to thinking about blogs and the fact that anyone can leave a comment to my posts. When someone comments, the polite thing to do is to respond with a comment under theirs. This may prompt an additional comment but really that person has no real intention of in depth discussion. They're just passing through.

It's a lot like walking down the street with a complete stranger approaching from the opposite direction. Your intention is to simply pass them by but as you come within talking distance the stranger says 'Hi, nice day isn't it.' Like they needed to share that little highlight of information to brighten your day too.

You can smile and nod in agreement, or go so far as to say 'Yes isn't it' whilst passing by without so much as a break in stride. It's all that is required to be polite.

Sometimes though, you want a bit more from your stranger. Why did they decide to say 'Hi' to you? Unfortunately you can't back track and ask your stran…