Skip to main content

Is The World Health Organization (WHO) Leveraging the Pandemic (COVID-19) to Boost Funding?

Photo by Anna Shvets.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) was first established in 1948 but I'm willing to bet the average citizen in most countries had never heard (or were only vaguely aware) of it until the first quarter of 2020 when the global pandemic, COVID-19, began to emerge as a world wide concern.

As you would expect one of the main goals of WHO is to improve the health of world populations, which it does through its Universal Health Coverage target.

Its two other major targets are:

  • Better protected people from health emergencies.
  • People enjoying better health and well-being.

Each of these three targets aspire to benefiting at least one billion MORE people over a five year period, at which time the strategy is evaluated, reviewed, revised, and reimplemented for the next five years, and so on (I presume). Note that 'more' is important because the overall target is to deliver better health to ALL and not just the same one billion people.

The organisation is funded through member state Assessed Contributions (a percentage of a country’s Gross Domestic Product), basically a membership fee. These fees account for less than 20% of the organisation's total funding.

The rest of their funding comes from Voluntary Contributions, mostly from member states (in addition to their Assessed Contribution), and other partners. There are three levels of voluntary contributions:

  • Core voluntary contributions (CVC) (3.9%)- fully flexible funding with no conditions attached.
  • Thematic and strategic engagement funds (6%) - partially flexible funding that, generally, has stricter guidelines around reporting and accountability to meet contributor's requirements.
  • Specified voluntary contributions (90.1%) - these funds are earmarked to specific programmatic areas and/or geographical locations and must be spent within a specified timeframe.

It's in the area of Voluntary Contributions things get a bit murky (not helped by WHO's website collapsing a part of their VC funding section so you may miss the conditional funding headings) leaving WHO open to conspiracy theorists about who is pulling their strings.

However, if you go to their Budget Portal you can pretty much see all their contributors and percentage contributions (there's actually a very interactive chart that lets you search for contributors by name... go on... I know you're itching to search 'Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation' right now aren't you!).

You may wonder what all this preamble is leading to?

I've noticed that, as countries are starting to relax restrictions on COVID-19, such as mask wearing and QR code tracking. WHO, and particularly WHO's advisory group SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization), have been particularly vocal on not easing restrictions too soon, as well as reinforcing the risk of further COVID-19 variants.

While it may be WHO just being over cautious, I'm not the only random person on the internet that's noticed the pandemic has been a huge profile boost for the organization, and is providing some leverage in terms of turning their funding back around to 1980's levels, where 80% of their funding was through Assessed Contributions. As noted in this article, COVID-19 has shown sustainable financing of WHO is needed to deliver health for all.

As far as I'm aware WHO isn't trying to turn the percentages around by reducing Voluntary Contributions (which would be ridiculous policy). Rather they're trying to justify bumping up Assessed Contribution fees by a considerable amount (from 20% to 50% currently, as proposed by member states). That would be a major funding increase (though inevitably it may still reduce Voluntary Contributions).

If WHO once again moves out of the public spotlight too soon, maybe their funding goals won't be as easy to achieve?

I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any means but I do understand that no organization is above questionable, strategic tactics (just look at how Donald Trump tried to pull all US funding from WHO during his Presidency). 

WHO wants countries to 'get back to normal' but maybe not too quickly? Memories can be short when it comes to global funding, especially funding that the contributor has no control of once handed over.

So far we haven't really heard about another major global variant of COVID-19 after Omicron, and in many countries the curve of new daily cases is on a downward trend. That's not to say we're out of the pandemic but maybe more countries are just better equipped to manage it two years on (you would hope so, right?).

If WHO really wants to make a case for increased funding and global collaboration on health, rather than scaring us with a possible 'next wave' of some COVID-19 variant, maybe they should focus more on how their recommendations, and advice, have succeeded. Showcase more of their achievements in overcoming the pandemic rather than issuing warnings and speculation of possible catastrophes that could be around the corner.

Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

TV Series Review: The Office - Australia (Prime Video) (2024) *No Spoilers*

W hile I'm a late comer fan of The Office, only watching after the original and USA versions were both available on streaming services, I did watch them in the order of release i.e. I watched the U.K. version first. Now, with the release of the Australian version of The Office on Prime Video, I think it's best to approach watching this new version understanding that it is not those shows. More importantly, remembering the US version was not well received or as popular as it has become since streaming became a thing. I personally remember people often saying the original version was better, back in the day. Of course, the Australian version has analogues for all the same characters you're familiar with from the previous versions, with their characteristics, so you can easily see who is the Aussie version of each character. While there are actually 13 different adaptations of the series worldwide, I was surprised to learn this is the first time the boss has been female. No...

TV Series Review: Velma (2023-2024) *No Spoilers*

A s a kid, Scooby Doo cartoons were something I used to watch fairly regularly. I wasn't a diehard fan but it was one of the better, of the many, cartoons I used to watch. I had heard about the new animated series, Velma , around the time of its release but it wasn't coming out on any streaming service I was subscribed to so it went off my radar pretty quickly. Quite by chance I signed up to a streaming service so I could watch DC Entertainment's, The Penguin, and noticed Velma was on that platform. I figured I may as well get my money's worth out of the subscription. I did know that Velma, herself, had been race swapped for the show, which made no real difference to me, though I do prefer classic Velma if pushed to choose. However the first episode of season one was a real shock to my expectations! No where had I heard this series was skewing very much into adult humor and themes. I was expecting something more along the lines of the original Scooby Doo show. Instead I...

Trump's 2024 Election Win Will Change Everything - At Least I Sure Hope It Does!

Trump by Leonardo.ai & TET A s an outsider looking in on the US 2024 election, right up until election day, it is beyond my belief that the election continued to be a 'close race'. It is even further beyond my belief that Trump won, without question.  Even if the Democrats wanted to claim the election was rigged somehow (which I'm sure Trump was gearing up to do had the outcome been different) it would be hard to make the case, beyond a recount. There's no slim margin here. Trump clearly won. While I would've preferred a Blue win, I at least got one outcome I was hoping for. A clear winner on election day. If I could give the Democrats some free, unsolicited advice for the next election. Stop targeting the opposition as if they're somehow selfish, evil villains. That's not how political parties work. At the end of the day the all represent the public. The people. The everyday citizen who you're trying to convince that you have what it takes to meet t...

Movie Review: Memory (2023)

S omething a little different for me in terms of movies I usually review,  Memory  is a film I was invited along to see by my partner, and both of us didn't know much about the movie going in, other than it was a film where one of the leads has dementia. The basic premise follows adult, special needs social worker, Sylvia (Jessica Chastain), who leads a simple and structured life. When Saul (Peter Sarsgaard) follows her home from their high school reunion the surprise encounter profoundly impacts both of their lives. The film starts out very awkward and disjointed to some degree, which I feel is intentional, to reflect that Sylvia, who is also a struggling single mother, is fairly resilient, she is, in many ways, just barely holding everything together because she doesn't have any other option. When Saul sees Sylvia at their high school reunion it seems like some unpleasant memories from her past are fast tracked into the forefront of her life, and things move forward fro...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Movie Review: Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (2023) *No Spoilers*

I f you're like me and didn't go to see  Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom  in theatres you made the right choice. For context, I loved the first Aquaman movie . It's one of my favorites from the Snyder/DCEU era. It is a relatively well made adventure story, with some fantastic world building, amazing visuals, and included some commentary on  environmental issues as well. Despite having, mostly the same creative team, Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom comes across as a film that couldn't decide what it wanted to be, in terms of a sequel. On the one hand it wants to showcase the cool, fun, wisecracking, but bad ass, rock'n'roll  version of Aquaman (Jason Momoa) with another rollicking adventure. On the other it feels like someone said it had to be epic with potentially world changing stakes so Aquaman would have to do 'King Shit' and be all serious, navigate deep sea politics, and generally try to be a responsible heroic good guy that he is when he's not being ...

Optimus Robots, Self Driving Cars and Buses - Tesla's 'We Robot' Event and the Evolution of Optimus

Tesla Optimus Robot Serving Guests. Image: Tesla O n the tenth of October Tesla held their 'We Robot' event, which I guess is the new incarnation of their previous Tesla AI Day annual event. There were three much talked about reveals, the driverless taxis, a driverless bus, and Optimus robots moving around the event, fully interacting with people 'on the ground'. Tesla Driverless Taxi. Image: Tesla While it was cool to see so many driverless taxis, that you could get in and experience for yourself as they drove around the Warner Brothers lot, and the driverless bus was something of a surprise reveal nobody expected, my attention was on Optimus. Tesla Driverless Robovan. Image: Tesla It was in September of 2021 that Elon Musk first announced his plan to create an affordable, humanoid, domestic robot, that would eventually be in homes worldwide. That vision was underlined with a person wearing a robot suit, that wasn't as well received as Elon may have liked, despite...