Skip to main content

Is The World Health Organization (WHO) Leveraging the Pandemic (COVID-19) to Boost Funding?

Photo by Anna Shvets.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) was first established in 1948 but I'm willing to bet the average citizen in most countries had never heard (or were only vaguely aware) of it until the first quarter of 2020 when the global pandemic, COVID-19, began to emerge as a world wide concern.

As you would expect one of the main goals of WHO is to improve the health of world populations, which it does through its Universal Health Coverage target.

Its two other major targets are:

  • Better protected people from health emergencies.
  • People enjoying better health and well-being.

Each of these three targets aspire to benefiting at least one billion MORE people over a five year period, at which time the strategy is evaluated, reviewed, revised, and reimplemented for the next five years, and so on (I presume). Note that 'more' is important because the overall target is to deliver better health to ALL and not just the same one billion people.

The organisation is funded through member state Assessed Contributions (a percentage of a country’s Gross Domestic Product), basically a membership fee. These fees account for less than 20% of the organisation's total funding.

The rest of their funding comes from Voluntary Contributions, mostly from member states (in addition to their Assessed Contribution), and other partners. There are three levels of voluntary contributions:

  • Core voluntary contributions (CVC) (3.9%)- fully flexible funding with no conditions attached.
  • Thematic and strategic engagement funds (6%) - partially flexible funding that, generally, has stricter guidelines around reporting and accountability to meet contributor's requirements.
  • Specified voluntary contributions (90.1%) - these funds are earmarked to specific programmatic areas and/or geographical locations and must be spent within a specified timeframe.

It's in the area of Voluntary Contributions things get a bit murky (not helped by WHO's website collapsing a part of their VC funding section so you may miss the conditional funding headings) leaving WHO open to conspiracy theorists about who is pulling their strings.

However, if you go to their Budget Portal you can pretty much see all their contributors and percentage contributions (there's actually a very interactive chart that lets you search for contributors by name... go on... I know you're itching to search 'Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation' right now aren't you!).

You may wonder what all this preamble is leading to?

I've noticed that, as countries are starting to relax restrictions on COVID-19, such as mask wearing and QR code tracking. WHO, and particularly WHO's advisory group SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization), have been particularly vocal on not easing restrictions too soon, as well as reinforcing the risk of further COVID-19 variants.

While it may be WHO just being over cautious, I'm not the only random person on the internet that's noticed the pandemic has been a huge profile boost for the organization, and is providing some leverage in terms of turning their funding back around to 1980's levels, where 80% of their funding was through Assessed Contributions. As noted in this article, COVID-19 has shown sustainable financing of WHO is needed to deliver health for all.

As far as I'm aware WHO isn't trying to turn the percentages around by reducing Voluntary Contributions (which would be ridiculous policy). Rather they're trying to justify bumping up Assessed Contribution fees by a considerable amount (from 20% to 50% currently, as proposed by member states). That would be a major funding increase (though inevitably it may still reduce Voluntary Contributions).

If WHO once again moves out of the public spotlight too soon, maybe their funding goals won't be as easy to achieve?

I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any means but I do understand that no organization is above questionable, strategic tactics (just look at how Donald Trump tried to pull all US funding from WHO during his Presidency). 

WHO wants countries to 'get back to normal' but maybe not too quickly? Memories can be short when it comes to global funding, especially funding that the contributor has no control of once handed over.

So far we haven't really heard about another major global variant of COVID-19 after Omicron, and in many countries the curve of new daily cases is on a downward trend. That's not to say we're out of the pandemic but maybe more countries are just better equipped to manage it two years on (you would hope so, right?).

If WHO really wants to make a case for increased funding and global collaboration on health, rather than scaring us with a possible 'next wave' of some COVID-19 variant, maybe they should focus more on how their recommendations, and advice, have succeeded. Showcase more of their achievements in overcoming the pandemic rather than issuing warnings and speculation of possible catastrophes that could be around the corner.

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

Skateboard Trick Tips: Two Ways to Ollie North (Ollie One foot)

You have to be quick to see my Ollie Norths! Ollie One Foots, otherwise known as the Ollie North, is one of those skateboard tricks you learn and then tend not to do very much as more interesting trick challenges grab your attention. However it does look really cool if you learn how to kick your front foot well past the nose of your skateboard. Still shot from Braille Skateboarding's Ollie North tutorial. I was inspired to make my video below, showing two different techniques to achieve a successful Ollie One Foot, when I not only saw that Braille Skateboarding's Tutorial used a different method to the one I had learned but also, when I looked at various other video tutorials, I discovered yet another technique, with no one using the method I had originally learned. Braille's method is to simply Ollie and drag your front foot past the front of your board. The second method I came across in several video tutorials is to Ollie, drag your front foot and tap your

How to Transfer Any Line Art to Your Griptape - Easy Skateboard Griptape Art Tutorial

Dog Star Griptape Art by TET Griptape art is once again gaining popularity amongst modern skateboarders. For those of us who have tried to create our own griptape art, using paint pens, you'll know reproducing your design onto the grip, without making any mistakes is incredibly challenging. Mostly because you just have to go for it and draw the design freehand, with paint pens, directly onto the griptape. You can make the odd mistake here or there but if you get the proportions of the design completely wrong, it can be very difficult to fix. Often you just have to live with the mistake. To address the problem I've come up with an easy way anyone can transfer a line art design to their griptape, removing almost all the anxiety of getting the proportions wrong. In fact, you could do this with any line art design, even if you have no drawing skill at all. Watch the video below to see my technique in action and/or skip past the video where I highlight the basic steps to get your de

Review: FP Footwear FINO Skate Shoes

FP Footwear FINO Skate Shoes I first saw FP's FINO skate shoes in a video by YouTube channel, Braille Skateboarding, titled, THE FIRST EVER NON NEWTONIAN FLUID SKATE SHOES!? As someone whose feet hurt and bruise relatively easily just from the basic tricks of skateboarding (Ollies, Pop Shuv-its etc.) the 90% absorption of impact energy selling point seemed like an ideal solution for minimizing my injuries. A day later I placed an order through FP's website . ​​ Ordinarily I wouldn't mention Customer Service but I can't let the lack of communication on my order slide. FP's website says to expect delivery within 7-14 days of your order. After close to two weeks, my order was still marked as being processed. I sent an email asking for any kind of update, to no response. A day or two later my order was marked as completed but still no signs of shoes in my mail? About two weeks later (just over a full month of placing my order) the shoes arrived. I'm sur

Why Your Backside 180 Ollies Suck (Probably, if they're like mine)

Backside 180 Ollie by TET I've been doing backside 180 ollies on my skateboard for almost as long as I've been skateboarding. It's not really that hard a trick to learn, except it is, if you want to do them well. Usually, when I'm practicing my backside 180 ollies on flat, my first attempt will be my best, and then my technique will kind of deteriorate from there. Except for that one jaggy attempt where I successfully land the backside 180 ollie then continue to pivot on my back truck another 180 degrees. Which is only a cool trick if you actually meant to do it. Recently I spent an entire driveway skate session working on my backside 180 ollies. My goal was to get them higher, rotate my body more effectively, and to bend my back leg more (a common problem for most people is not really bending the back leg as you ollie). You can watch my session and decide if I made any progress in the video below. The thing is, I know everything I'm doing wrong with my backside 180

Can You Learn Skateboarding Basics on a Cheap Skateboard?

$20, Mambo 31" x 8", Department Store Skateboard. Over the years I've watched many high profile YouTube skateboarders repeatedly create videos where they purchase a cheap, department store skateboard, ride it like they would their regular professional skateboard, until it breaks (usually within an hour or so), and claim that as a reason for steering clear of these products. ​Inadvertently what they're doing is creating less demand for cheap skateboards, meaning it's less likely department stores will stock them, resulting in no easy way for first time skaters to 'test the waters' to see if skating is really for them. Even worse, parents looking to get their children into a new sport, may not even see skateboarding as an option as they browse through the department store sports section. At the time of writing, Australian department stores have shelves filled with many different brands of scooters, alongside a small shelf or two of skateboards (and

Movie Review: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 (2023) *No Spoilers*

If you've enjoyed Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 1 and Volume 2 then  Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3  will not disappoint. I would almost go so far as to call it the best in the series... except seeing the first movie for the first time is still one of my best memories of the MCU. While it's not essential to the story if you didn't see the Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special on Disney+ it does kind of lead into and set up where the Guardians are at in Volume 3 quite nicely. In this installment Peter Quill (Chris Pratt) is still not coping with the loss of his timeline's Gamora (Zoe Saldada) when suddenly the team is attacked leaving Rocket (Bradley Cooper) in a very bad way. From then on it's a race to save Rocket as we learn quite a bit about his origin in the process. This movie is slightly darker than the first two and, if you're concerned about the animal cruelty that is causing some people to not want to see the film again, keep in mind, it's j

Movie Review: Bullet Train (2022) *No Spoilers*

I honestly don't understand why Bullet Train didn't do well in theaters? It's basically a live action, bonkers, cartoon but it's fun, has witty dialogue, quirky characters, and plenty of action. It's definitely underrated as something that very much reminds me of a cross between a Guy Ritchie and Edgar Wright film in terms of how it's written, filmed, and edited. The plot centers around unlucky assassin, Ladybug (Brad Pitt) who is hired to retrieve a briefcase containing a ransom from on board a Japanese Bullet Train. Unfortunately he's not the only one after the case. Confusion and mayhem ensues. The only thing that really bothered me is that the movie seems almost devoid of regular people on the train and at any of the stations. Those that are present, including the staff of the train, seem to be blissfully unaware of what is happening around them despite the interior of the train becoming increasingly more damaged and the body count climbing. The further